One of the reasons I believe the Hollie Greig story is a hoax (apart from zero evidence based on an unsworn statement) is because it happened at a time when people in the Alternative Media were looking into the Dunblane genuine horror and asking difficult questions the mainstream media were not asking. So a distraction had to be created.
I think the Hampstead story is being used to distract from something else we were getting close to, and Mi5 had to create some new bright lights of 'Satanic Sparklers' and "Paedophile Sprinkles' in order to move highly excitable and hysterical types' attention away from something very real and dangerous to the establishment.
- Same list of characters involved in both cases.
- Same wild hysteria and same reaction from the Alternative Media.
- Again, a mother with questionable behaviour being held up as some kind of sainted martyr. A woman who disgustingly put her own young children on camera for the world to see regardless of the horrific repercussions for them later on in terms of school-bullying and so forth.
- Most depressing of all; people who have been found guilty of no crimes having their lives ruined after being 'outed' as "Satanic Paedophiles in'nt".
Do you recall the main 'evidence' claiming that Hollie Greig was telling the truth..."that people with Downs Syndrome do not lie".
What absolute rubbish.
What absolute rubbish.
What are they using as 'evidence' in the Hampstead case?..."kids do not make up stories like this about sex abuse".
Kids will say anything they are told to say for a reward.
Kids will say anything they are told to say for a reward.
WHY?
If I was to make a guess as to why the intelligence services created this latest Satanic Abuse False Flag, it would be to distract from the list of MPs and the sex parties which came to light in late 2014. The story went mainstream and the establishment were clearly very, very worried. They had to create another hysteria-infused distraction.
Suddenly, the Alternative Media have forgotten all about the case involving the MPs' sex parties and possible murder of a young boy by an MP - which appears to be a real scandal - as they are now looking wildly for non-existent 'Satanic Paedo Rings in Hampstead'. There is the same round of nasty in-fighting in the Alternative Movement with the 'true believers' calling out anyone who doubts the Hampstead case as being 'paedos' themselves. Same sickness and divisions like last time.
The establishment got caught with their proverbial knickers down with the Profumo Affair in the 1960s. Since then, Mi5 has been active in creating distractions so it never happens again. The Satanic Panic of the 1980s was to deflect from Cyril Smith and his boy-raping friends. In 2015, they have done it again with the Hampstead case.
The establishment got caught with their proverbial knickers down with the Profumo Affair in the 1960s. Since then, Mi5 has been active in creating distractions so it never happens again. The Satanic Panic of the 1980s was to deflect from Cyril Smith and his boy-raping friends. In 2015, they have done it again with the Hampstead case.
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED
(again)
(again)
UPDATE
I have been 100% vindicated in my theory surrounding this case the morning following the above broadcast. Kids were lying and retracted the 'Satanic Embellishments', there was 'neglect' of the kids, new love and jealousy involved and a mother out of control.
Groomers in the video in deep shit.
Thomas check this out. http://www.yorkshireripper.com/
ReplyDeletePeter Sutcliffe was a copy-cat killer, responsible for only four of the thirteen murders which he ‘confessed’ to. He had been eliminated twelve times by the police because he was blood group O. The Yorkshire Ripper was known to be blood group B.
This came out 35 years ago in David Yallop's book on the case while he was an embedded journalist in the South Yorkshire Police.
Deleteand Jimmy Savile's blood was...
New-ish to Thomas's work here... just curious how one gets approval to participate at the Facebook community? Far as I know I'm not a psychopath, but I am (unfortunately perhaps) an American who recently discovered that the shameful, un-talked-about branch of my family tree traces back to Irish slavery in the American colonies. As a result I'm quite interested in the Irish mythic stuff Thomas talks about and the consequences of this handed down to me epigenetically. Just looking to learn what I can from reliable sources.
ReplyDeleteThanks much.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteHere’s one of the most common questions I get from students:
ReplyDelete“How is cold email different from spam?”
Cold email and spam are polar opposites.
Here’s why…
Spam:
• Uses a fake name
• Doesn’t include contact information
• Isn’t personalized (the same email is sent to several people)
• Isn’t meant to start a conversation; rather, it’s usually targeting
a direct purchase.
• Has a commercial motive.
Spam is an example of a one-to-many email.
Can you see the difference?
This cold email does three things:
• It addresses the recipient directly.
• It has a highly specific and relevant request.
• And it mentions a common contact.
I’m not trying to push a product, or get anyone on the phone for a long conversation.
The real world equivalent of this email would be
like saying, “Hi,” to a friend of a friend you bumped into
at a conference.
It’s not pushy.
It’s not annoying.
And it’s perfectly reasonable, as long as your
call to action isn’t overly aggressive.
For example: “Buy my product!”
Sounds pushy, right?
But if you say: “Let’s get coffee sometime!”
That sounds a lot better.
Want a ‘sniff test’ for spam vs. cold email?
Before you send out a cold email, ask yourself:
Would I be comfortable saying this to someone I met at a conference for the
first time?
If the answer is no, then it’s likely spam.
If the answer is yes, then it’s a cold email.
Keep in mind that spam is illegal. Send too much spam and you will run afoul of CAN SPAM laws.
Are you clear about whether an email falls under the CAN SPAM laws?
It can be tricky. So let me break it down:
As per FTC, all emails can contain three types of information:
• Commercial content, such as selling a product, promoting a sale, etc.
• Relationship or transactional content, such
as a bank sending its customer a bank statement, an e-commerce store sharing
transaction details, or a blogger sending a message to his list
of subscribers.
• Other content, which can range from personal
content to mixed (relationship + commercial) content.
According to FTC’s regulations, the purpose
of an email decides whether it needs to comply with spam laws.
If the email is primarily commercial – or is deemed to be so by the recipient – it has to comply with spam laws.
A well-crafted cold email might have a commercial tilt, but it also offers significant value.
Now, let’s get into how you can write amazing cold emails that convert!
Hi (recipient’s first name),
My name is (your first name), and I’m (title) at (company
name). We are currently offering (describe product/service).
This is just an educated stab in the dark, but based on your
online profile, you seem to be the right person to
connect with. Or, if not, maybe you can point me in the right direction?
I’d like to speak with someone from (company name) who’s responsible for (position relevant to
your product/service).
If that’s you, are you open to a 15-minute call on (specific time/date) to discuss
ways (service/product) can more specifically help your business?
Or, if not you, can you please put me in touch with the
right person?
I’d appreciate the help!
(Signature)
Here’s one of the most common questions I get from
ReplyDeletestudents:
“How is cold email different from spam?”
Cold email and spam are polar opposites.
Here’s why…
Spam:
• Uses a fake name
• Doesn’t include contact information
• Isn’t personalized (the same email is sent to several people)
• Isn’t meant to start a conversation; rather, it’s usually targeting a direct purchase.
• Has a commercial motive.
Spam is an example of a one-to-many email.
Can you see the difference?
This cold email does three things:
• It addresses the recipient directly.
• It has a highly specific and relevant request.
• And it mentions a common contact.
I’m not trying to push a product, or get anyone on the phone for a long conversation.
The real world equivalent of this email would be like saying, “Hi,” to a friend of a friend you bumped
into at a conference.
It’s not pushy.
It’s not annoying.
And it’s perfectly reasonable, as long as your call to action isn’t overly aggressive.
For example: “Buy my product!”
Sounds pushy, right?
But if you say: “Let’s get coffee sometime!”
That sounds a lot better.
Want a ‘sniff test’ for spam vs. cold email?
Before you send out a cold email, ask yourself:
Would I be comfortable saying this to someone I met at a conference for the first time?
If the answer is no, then it’s likely spam.
If the answer is yes, then it’s a cold email.
Keep in mind that spam is illegal. Send too much spam and you will run afoul of CAN SPAM laws.
Are you clear about whether an email falls under the CAN SPAM
laws?
It can be tricky. So let me break it down:
As per FTC, all emails can contain three types of information:
• Commercial content, such as selling a product, promoting
a sale, etc.
• Relationship or transactional content, such as a bank sending its customer
a bank statement, an e-commerce store sharing transaction details, or a blogger sending a message
to his list of subscribers.
• Other content, which can range from personal content to mixed (relationship
+ commercial) content.
According to FTC’s regulations, the purpose of an email decides whether it needs to comply with spam laws.
If the email is primarily commercial – or is deemed to be
so by the recipient – it has to comply with spam laws.
A well-crafted cold email might have a commercial
tilt, but it also offers significant value.
Now, let’s get into how you can write amazing cold emails that convert!
Hi (recipient’s first name),
My name is (your first name), and I’m (title) at (company name).
We are currently offering (describe product/service).
This is just an educated stab in the dark, but based on your online profile, you seem to be the right person to
connect with. Or, if not, maybe you can point me in the right direction?
I’d like to speak with someone from (company name) who’s
responsible for (position relevant to your product/service).
If that’s you, are you open to a 15-minute call on (specific time/date) to discuss ways (service/product)
can more specifically help your business?
Or, if not you, can you please put me in touch with the right
person?
I’d appreciate the help!
(Signature)