tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post586245883023224700..comments2023-12-22T02:22:42.052-08:00Comments on Thomas Sheridan's Official Blog: One Question for Flat EarthersThomas Sheridanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01666150454652215104noreply@blogger.comBlogger66125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-52109612535066446642016-02-04T08:11:00.065-08:002016-02-04T08:11:00.065-08:00"If, as you claim the earth is a flat disk wh..."If, as you claim the earth is a flat disk which is not spinning in space, then why does my 30 year old 6 inch reflecting telescope have an equatorial mount and an electric motor?" - Simple..... so you had to spend more money to learn nothing matey!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-42371008649763241682016-01-18T23:57:54.512-08:002016-01-18T23:57:54.512-08:00seems pretty stupid for a proof of the globe. I me...seems pretty stupid for a proof of the globe. I mean look, snipers.....cryptogearhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04818122370585705924noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-33206181948823036072016-01-17T04:14:54.561-08:002016-01-17T04:14:54.561-08:00If the adjustment is to keep the object in frame, ...If the adjustment is to keep the object in frame, then it can be seen that the sky luminaries are moving. Have a look at time-lapse photography. <br />But I will still listen to your video.Wahooooonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-23171761459590865912016-01-15T02:14:50.688-08:002016-01-15T02:14:50.688-08:00Almost forgot to mention, we also concluded that m...Almost forgot to mention, we also concluded that most of the readers of this Flat Earth post are schizophrenic and enable to write proper sentences.<br />Quote Anonymouse: "Only a schizophrenic could have a sincere belief in the notion of a flat earth, and schizophrenics can't construct intelligible sentences."<br /><br />Sadly we did not hear any debates Pro-Equatorial Mount, or Non-Pro-Airy's Failure. Or even vice versa for that matter, sadly, oh I already said that was sad we didn't hear more about it, sadly enough.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07632193109894122332noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-33464994683839553142016-01-15T02:07:13.913-08:002016-01-15T02:07:13.913-08:00We failed to debate: Equatorial Mount vs. Airy'...We failed to debate: Equatorial Mount vs. Airy's Failure.<br /><br />At least we proved these blog readers are open minded to Transhumanism. Since I am convinced that is all that will be solved on this particular blog post. I can settle for that I suppose. Praise Transhumanism! Long live the Cybernetics, because I don't know Telescopes are cyber and transhumanistic.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07632193109894122332noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-18772014282374097812016-01-13T23:22:41.270-08:002016-01-13T23:22:41.270-08:00Oh for Chissake, knock it off with the flat earth ...Oh for Chissake, knock it off with the flat earth shit.I've a feeling many of you are doing it to to be dicks.cindy Rhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01086306452558887942noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-29283654518306646262016-01-12T14:06:24.423-08:002016-01-12T14:06:24.423-08:00Aside from Flat Earth comments Mr. Sheridan has ma...Aside from Flat Earth comments Mr. Sheridan has made.<br />He flat out lied saying: "There are no Satanic pediphiles running around." I have massive disrespect for liars that support organizations by spreading lies for them.<br /><br /><br />Regarding Flat Earth comments. It is very unfortunate for Flat Earth Society that Mr. Sheridan has joined into their debate. Flat Earth doesn't need Chaos Agents in there midst. They will do better debating with a willing scientist, not some person with literally a Dark Background.<br /><br />I'm glad I used offensive words in my post. I see now that using cuss words gives Mr. Sheridan an excuse to ignore the evidence he asked for in the form of Airy's Failure. I assume now he'll take it off his Blog and attempt to make a reply to me on some other forum that I am not apart of, so he can use slander and defamation like most paid disinformation shills do, knowing full well how unlikely it will be that I will encounter such a post. Perhaps another one of his friends will post more stuff about Flat Earth people being schizophrenic again, that will be nice to hear more about that. I am well familiar with the loosing sides tactics and how they quickly research the oppositions individuals then post Trolling comments looking for a reaction, like for example using the "Schizophrenia" topic to Troll with. Which by the way I don't understand how that person concluded that Flat Earth people are Schizophrenic. When it all comes out, what matters is that Thomas Sheridan gets the level of exposure that he's always wanted and perhaps considerably more. Talk hard.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07632193109894122332noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-35176108110398813172016-01-11T07:29:40.480-08:002016-01-11T07:29:40.480-08:00The topic of Flat or Heliocentric earth is clearly...The topic of Flat or Heliocentric earth is clearly a hot topic and very much up for debate. Some of the flat earth and globe earth views are extreme and without evidence. I would love to discuss the topic with Thomas Sheridan in a rational way. I have a massive amount of respect for Mr Sheridan and his research. I would dearly like him to put his views on psychopathology and flat earth on Flat Earth UK. Thomas Sheridan is no fool and a high profile opponent of the flat earth. I would like thise views to be heard by a captive flat earth audience but free from childishness and insulting comments. Thank you Thomas Sheridan for entering the debate! I for one value your opinions as a flat earth advocate and hope you continue in the debate. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-78919628714611596332016-01-10T22:10:31.520-08:002016-01-10T22:10:31.520-08:00After reviewing this blog. I see the question has ...After reviewing this blog. I see the question has not been specifically asked. So here it is:<br /><br />"Thomas Sheridan, please explain to your viewers, in a paragraph or more, 'How does the Gedenkenexperiment regarding Airey's Failure have an impact on a Telescope's Equatorial Mount?'"<br /><br />It is now Official! The question has been asked, Officially by me. I'm sure there is no need for me to paste the link that I've been sending you to read, again.<br /><br />I await a non-defamation, non-slander, non-aloof, and intelligent paragraph or more reply that relates to Airy's Failure. Thanks in advance.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07632193109894122332noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-35792347221896159522016-01-10T13:29:08.911-08:002016-01-10T13:29:08.911-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07632193109894122332noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-89474624652700772502016-01-10T11:18:51.668-08:002016-01-10T11:18:51.668-08:00I've been posting since New Years Day. I direc...I've been posting since New Years Day. I direct my posts to Thomas in particular. Flat Earthers are commenting on my posts already-all expectant, positive stuff. Thomas refuses to answer my question. I even cut and pasted (http://www.geocentricity.com/ba1/no066/vdkamp.html) the material pertaining to my question of an equatorial mount being affected by Airy's Failure in Thomas's blog section for the ones too lazy to even listen to the news. The shills just repeat what Thomas Sheridan and co. have already said in his Blog posts. They certainly qualify as paid Shills in my book. Thank you Truthers.<br /><br />Thomas Sheridan is following Typical Mind Control Cult Reactions. He points fingers at others using slander and defamation tactics against those who question Ball Earth, while refusing to answer questions even after being provided content material.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07632193109894122332noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-15397882216019024312016-01-10T07:04:40.467-08:002016-01-10T07:04:40.467-08:00Typical Mind Control Cult Reaction. Typical Mind Control Cult Reaction. Thomas Sheridanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01666150454652215104noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-46937724349965684532016-01-10T03:35:12.229-08:002016-01-10T03:35:12.229-08:00I just posted this on Google + and set it to Publi...I just posted this on Google + and set it to Public. I didn't send it to anyone in particular. Flat Earthers are commenting on it already-all emotional, negative stuff. They don't answer your question. I even cut and pasted your explaination of an equatorial mount in the comments section for the ones too lazy to even look at this post. They have no answer to your question and avoid it. Not an original thought among them. They just repeat what Eric Dubay and co. have already said in YouTube videos. They certainly qualify as a Cult in my book. Thank you Thomas.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-45463581476618129142016-01-08T11:52:37.343-08:002016-01-08T11:52:37.343-08:00I too am surprised that Thomas made a video concer...I too am surprised that Thomas made a video concerning the Flat Earth topic. Since he is so unwilling to review and discuss the discoveries that lead to such flat earth conclusions.<br /><br />I get the impression that Thomas is just looking for Click-Bait material while actually not being interested or versed on the material he's posting to raise his Hit Counter, and making a good sum with forced web advertising on the side I bet, while we come to his site following his Click-Bait traps.<br /><br />My advice: Boycott Thomas.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07632193109894122332noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-45989738290896117882016-01-07T17:36:53.526-08:002016-01-07T17:36:53.526-08:00Is the table flat?
The table may appear to be fl...Is the table flat? <br /> The table may appear to be flat but it is made of molecules and atoms, that are relatively vast distance apart, which are NOT flat. The table top is not flat, but only appears flat to us because it is in the same volume as us. Outside our volume the table cannot possibly be flat. <br /> This is true, as well, for the Earth, it is outside of our volume and does not share the same 3 dimensions with our volume. This is why the Earth is flat, and for no other reason. <br />The flat-Earth is a loaded phrase. The people promoting the psyop believe they are pulling the wool over everyone's eyes, but the psyop fails, because the Earth can be explained, and rationalized, in this way, as actually being flat because it is outside our volume! <br /> Arguing that the Earth is round, is what they expect, but showing that the Earth is actually flat because the universe, this construction of the 4th dimension, must contain at least five separate volumes, discredits the plans of the flat-earth pundits, by promoting a belief, they thought could easily be later dismissed, that the Earth is flat. <br /> The Earth is a planet, and planets are in the 4th volume, people are in the 3rd volume. Things, like planets, outside of our volume, must be seen as being flat, from a human perspective. <br />It's simple geometry. you knowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09061510251546562655noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-72845311296451747942016-01-07T14:46:22.718-08:002016-01-07T14:46:22.718-08:00I fail to see how that is proof that the Earth is ...I fail to see how that is proof that the Earth is a 'globe' in fact, that's a baseless presumption. You do realize the reason why the Globe was created was that Pythagoras (who contrary to popular belief did not adhere to the heliocentric model) thought the moons phases were caused by Earth's shadow, this of course turned out to be wrong. His belief was that there was a Hearth or Central Fire that every sphere was spinning around, and you should also note that his reason for this belief was contingent on his bias that he wanted to prove that he can understand everything in the universe using trigonometry and finding the hypotenuse, and the spheres were a direct relation of his theory of music and color, and hence that the "planets" being round were like notes.<br /><br />Aristarchus came up with the heliocentric model as a joke to a stoic who worshiped the sun but knew the Earth was geocentric. So he later wrote a book that outlined a thought experiment on what if the earth revolved around the sun. He himself did not believe it, and this is well understood, but it was Copernicus who brought both of those models for his masonic deception which he was ushered in as a canon of the Catholic Church to falsely present it without "bias."<br /><br />When he actually got to the point of explaining the telescope I had to sigh.<br /><br />He's telling you right there. THE SKY IS A SPHERE. Not the ground. You're misunderstanding this. He -thinks- that the sky is seen as a sphere because it follows the curvature of the Earth, and space would otherwise not be seen as a sphere (relatively if you were not on Earth) but this is wrong...<br /><br />You're seeing the sky as a sphere because it IS a sphere/dome, spinning, and thus the adjustments made to 'account for curvature' as it appears in the sky is just a shill explanation claiming the earth is curving so the celestial bodies appear to curve with it (due to rotation).<br /><br />I find it hard to believe you even looked into the Flat Earth seriously if you couldn't even deduct this obcvious distinction for yourself.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-18154219000554325862016-01-06T14:27:00.436-08:002016-01-06T14:27:00.436-08:00You're kidding me right? I posted this link ab...You're kidding me right? I posted this link about Airy's Failure. Then you completely ignore it, while pointing fingers at other people asking simpler questions, calling it research. Ha!<br /><br />Here is the Link Again: http://www.geocentricity.com/ba1/no066/vdkamp.html<br /><br />Read the $#%$# Page! And explain it to me LIKE I ASKED YOU TO!!! Or shutup about asking people to provide you with evidence that you're just going to ignore anyway Mr. Shillidan.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07632193109894122332noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-63263951545744976592016-01-05T15:07:40.360-08:002016-01-05T15:07:40.360-08:00Gordon Bennett, I've had to listen to this spe...Gordon Bennett, I've had to listen to this speeded up. Talk about irrelevant. Not special and not sobering. I don't know whether it's round or flat. What we need is 'experimentation'.<br />Anecdotal nonsense at best, Cointel pro at worst. NATO and soldiers doing their best, Ha Ha. Right or wrong, you don't look good Sheridan especially with your past nonsense.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-70064736796291479102016-01-05T15:07:00.290-08:002016-01-05T15:07:00.290-08:00Gordon Bennett, I've had to listen to this spe...Gordon Bennett, I've had to listen to this speeded up. Talk about irrelevant. Not special and not sobering. I don't know whether it's round or flat. What we need is 'experimentation'.<br />Anecdotal nonsense at best, Cointel pro at worst. NATO and soldiers doing their best, Ha Ha. Right or wrong, you don't look good Sheridan especially with your past nonsense.Bobhttp://none.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-42781713918167390612016-01-04T22:47:40.174-08:002016-01-04T22:47:40.174-08:00I will rather wax math any day. Than listen to you...I will rather wax math any day. Than listen to your opinionated biases. Your avoiding the math right now while avoiding explaining Airey's Failure. Please at least provide some conjecture if you don't have solid evidence to object Airey's Failure.<br />Been waiting since New Years for you to respond.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07632193109894122332noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-31519546097904341782016-01-04T14:27:02.729-08:002016-01-04T14:27:02.729-08:00In many ways the flat earth stuff is proof that Tr...In many ways the flat earth stuff is proof that Transhumanism is a real thing. Many people believe YT videos more than the reality they exist in now. The Flat Earth on YT, is more real to them than the spherical one they are standing upon.<br /><br />Terrifying actually.Thomas Sheridanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01666150454652215104noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-31351352085457402122016-01-04T08:36:16.074-08:002016-01-04T08:36:16.074-08:00As someone who's even more receptive of fringe...As someone who's even more receptive of fringe "conspiracy theories" than Thomas, I literally can't believe anyone would entertain the notion of a flat earth. Look at a satellite photo of the earth. Better yet, stand at a high elevation and look at the horizon. How fucking retarded can someone be? Maybe there are strange optical anomalies. All that proves is that you don't understand optics or math well enough to weigh in.<br /><br />I had no idea this was becoming a "thing." Is Paul McCartney dead? Maybe, maybe not. Was Sandy Hook a real shooting? Probably not. Is the earth flat? No – and we have mountains of incontrovertible evidence outweighing a few not-very-interesting brain-teasers. The fact that the earth is a sphere is better-established than the fact of gravity. Only a schizophrenic could have a sincere belief in the notion of a flat earth, and schizophrenics can't construct intelligible sentences.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-7867560809540969092016-01-03T19:57:40.298-08:002016-01-03T19:57:40.298-08:00Still waiting for your reply on the Gedenkenexperi...Still waiting for your reply on the Gedenkenexperiment regarding Airey's Failure.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07632193109894122332noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-64569789880492123402016-01-02T23:34:39.006-08:002016-01-02T23:34:39.006-08:00To put this another way, no matter where one goes ...To put this another way, no matter where one goes on the Earth, or in the solar system for that matter, we are going to be the same size, and in this same volume we are in now. Another planet would be flat too, to us. Not because it is flat, but because it is so much bigger than us that we only experience 2 of its 3 dimensions. Planets, and stars, are in a greater volume than ours, just as atoms are in a smaller volume than ours. We can only "know" the 3 dimensions of our volume, the sky can only show us 2 dimensions at a glance, the Earth can only show us 2 dimensions, and the atoms only show us 2 dimensions. All volumes outside our own, are flat, thus the Earth must be flat as well, as it is in a greater volume that we are. <br />The Earth is round in its volume, but we are not in the same volume as the Earth. And as we live in this smaller volume, the Earth, in its greater volume, for no other reason, is flat. you knowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09061510251546562655noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2124372886193391066.post-10153567246590349142016-01-02T18:21:33.260-08:002016-01-02T18:21:33.260-08:00In reference to celestial bodies;
Why have we bee...In reference to celestial bodies;<br /><br />Why have we been seeing these same constellations for 1000s of years? NASA claims it because stars are 1000 of light-years away so it take 1000s of ears for the light to reach us..I have a few problems with this claim. The Milkyway galaxy is estimated to be 100,000 light-years in diameter and was formed 13.6 billion years ago. So theoretically speaking the light from every star shouldve been visible from every point in the galaxy within the first 100,000 years of the galaxy's formation. Also I wonder why NASA sends billion dollar spaces probes to take photos of Jupiter if their high-powered telescopes can see into a galaxy millions of light-years away. As a matter of fact, there is a photo NASA released of them taking a photo of the Galileo space probe taking a photo of Jupiter...this seems redundant. I live in North Carolina in the U.S. I believe America has a huge part in deceiving people, although i have not seen acult like followings here in the states. I do imagine there are crazy people making cults in other places..it may be here where I live just not well known. We live in a time full of disinfo and trolls. Its difficult to know what's real and who's working for the government. So keep your guard up and take everything with a grain of salt...including this commentJustinnoreply@blogger.com